<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Vickie Flores - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-e02ad063" type="application/json"/><link>http://vickieflores.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://vickieflores.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:12:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-129843891</link><description>test</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:12:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-123315243</link><description>It reminds us how far things have come in such a short time!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've just seen this post which compares the 2000 iMac to the 2010 iPhone. It will be very interesting to see what we are another 10 years from now&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=19&amp;amp;t=1114049" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://arstechnica.com/phpbb/v...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Shannon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Last Photoshopped Squirrel</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=226#comment-96095443</link><description>facebook</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:19:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Last Photoshopped Squirrel</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=226#comment-96087257</link><description>testing</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flores</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Last Photoshopped Squirrel</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=226#comment-94516856</link><description>testing</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Photoshopped Squirrel Near Bishopsgate&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=207#comment-94487594</link><description>This is looking like the christmas card at the moment as it's not long *test comment*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-89538561</link><description>Comments are still not working as expected!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 20:48:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prophet the First Post</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=75#comment-89231092</link><description>test</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-89079756</link><description>Humm, given Jules posted this there's something not quite right here!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-89076406</link><description>Apparently there is a new breed of black squirrel that is going to push the American grey squirrels out.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Off you go and find one of those to photograph</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flores</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-88947349</link><description>Seems to work fine :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:33:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-88932945</link><description>testing disqus comments before I use it on wapping!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-88932765</link><description>Think you may be right Michael but he seemed in a hurry to get away from his work - maybe he wasn't happy with it :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Melon - it's wonderful to hear from you but I'm completely astounded, as you don't use a computer! Or are things changing? :). Even more surprised you found this, but brilliant obviously...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He must be a very clever squirrel to have made the long journey from Hereford!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-88932762</link><description>Flos, think this is the squirrel whose been at the bird table?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">melon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:17:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Squirrel near Bishopsgate, London EC2M</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=194#comment-88932761</link><description>Was he the rascally mischievous tagger dashing from his work in the background?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:) Great capture!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:19:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-88932751</link><description>Ooooooooh! A real computer! I bought a Mac SE/30 and spent the next three years hacking my degree on it. Fantastic machine. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Made the huge mistake of selling it a few years later - sob :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Baynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:11:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-88932750</link><description>I had one of these, it was my pride and joy.&lt;br&gt;Funny thing is if we all go to the cloud we'll be back without any hard drives again so a full circle in 20 years maybe!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shazza</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:53:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-88932747</link><description>Scary? A bit, indeed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consider this- that hard-drive had a footprint matching the bottom of that Mac, and was about 3 inches tall. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scary indeed is the item attached to my keys that contains over 533 times the capacity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-88932745</link><description>30MB! I'm sure the first one I used (on a network - apple talk?) didn't have any. &lt;br&gt;Quite frighening how fast things have moved as we're now talking TB's for hard drives which would have been unthinkable then.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-88932744</link><description>Thanks for jogging the memory bank.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My first mac was a Mac SE, that looked just like the one  you have pictured. I bought it used from a dentistry student at Case Western for a little under $3M. Plus, it came with something, besides a boatload of software, that made me King Sh!t for a while at User Group meetings...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... a THIRTY megabyte Hard Drive!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL. Yes, in a very short time we've come a very long way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:59:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-88932743</link><description>Hi John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I asked a photography friend who's a bit of a pixel expert and reliably informed it's the total pixels that determine resolution rather than dimensions. So by this the iPad is 4 times higher.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...be interesting to have a look at one of these now as it really wasn't that long ago!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:22:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macintosh Classic to iMac to iPad</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=126#comment-88932742</link><description>Came here from Woo themes to look at the format but have to leave a comment now.  &lt;br&gt;It's an interesting post, but isn't the iPad only twice the resolution not four times?  Sorry to be picky but I did find it entertaining as I think my dad still has one in the loft!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnP</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prophet the First Post</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=75#comment-88932741</link><description>Spud it is then ...movements, adjustments or spuds but I don't think Neil will ever grasp accounting.  But he was a good DBA and does take good photographs!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:42:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prophet the First Post</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=75#comment-88932740</link><description>Why can't we call him Spud any more?&lt;br&gt;Wasn't it "Magic Adjustments"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jules</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:36:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Prophet the First Post</title><link>http://www.vickieflores.com/?p=75#comment-88932739</link><description>Perhaps that should be on the spuds!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vickie Flo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
